Cut from all Chapters at UGA

[Hartofsec]

Originally Posted by amIblue?

Clearly, you missed the original Alabama-recruitment thread in which hartofsec was catty as all get out about DG. Read some more.

Ah yes, by all means. The thread where some of you were attacking and ridiculing a mother.

Exemplary representation of your respective chapters.

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by Hartofsec

Exemplary representation of your respective chapters.

I really don't think you want to go there -- you know, that whole pot and kettle problem.

[AOII Angel]

Originally Posted by Hartofsec

Actually, AOII Angel brought it up:



I just responded to her insinuation:




What might be questionable (or at least amazingly clairvoyant ), IMO, is an alum claiming to know why a PNM was released from recruitment, based on her own experience, 50 years ago, on a different campus.


[I]


I’m actually delighted that Delta Gamma recolonized at Bama – a much needed addition to the Greek system, and done very well.

The fact that girls who were released from recruitment were pledged as part of the new membership is not a negative, but rather a win/win. We shouldn’t make an assumption that something is inherently “wrong” with a girl who has been released from recruitment.

That’s the point (that I have made repeatedly).

This is rich. I didn't bring up Alabama; you did. No one has tried to say there is anything wrong with SECglitter, including Titchou. There was no reason to bring a colonizing chapter from another university into the discussion EXCEPT to through it in Titchou's face. There are no colonizing chapters at UGA so it is completely irrelevant otherwise. Don't blame me for your classless lack of judgement. When I disagree with Titchou, I just say so, I don't attack her organization. Leave her sorority out of it.

[amIblue?]

Originally Posted by Hartofsec

Ah yes, by all means. The thread where some of you were attacking and ridiculing a mother.

Exemplary representation of your respective chapters.

I didn't have anything to do with that, and you can leave me and my chapter out of it.

I don't think anyone was attacking or ridiculing that mother. They were trying to point out to her that she had essentially shut the barn door after the horse got out. Could their tones have been different? Absolutely.

You still need to shut your trap and read more.

[AOII Angel]

Isn't it nice that she's never identified her organization? She sits back and slams the underdog from her position of anonymity. So Panhellenic. I'm sure your sisters would be so proud. I just hope you are not an AOII!

[Hartofsec]

Originally Posted by AOII Angel

This is rich. I didn't bring up Alabama; you did. No one has tried to say there is anything wrong with SECglitter, including Titchou. There was no reason to bring a colonizing chapter from another university into the discussion EXCEPT to through it in Titchou's face. There are no colonizing chapters at UGA so it is completely irrelevant otherwise. Don't blame me for your classless lack of judgement. When I disagree with Titchou, I just say so, I don't attack her organization. Leave her sorority out of it.

Actually Titchou brought up Alabama.

Please point out where her organization has been attacked. Stating that a recolonizing organization pledges girls who have been released from recruitment is not an attack.

Rather, it is some of you who are imposing a negative view on pledging these girls with your characterization of this as an "attack."

[AOII Angel]

Originally Posted by Hartofsec

Actually Titchou brought up Alabama.

Please point out where her organization has been attacked. Stating that a recolonizing organization pledges girls who have been released from recruitment is not an attack.

Rather, it is some of you who are imposing a negative view on pledging these girls with your characterization of this as an "attack."

It has nothing to do with pledging women who may have been released from recruitment. It is about a pattern of bringing up DG specifically to slam Titchou. She never said that SECglitter or women who were released are not worthy of membership. You read that into her posts then threw her chapter's new colonization in her face and said, "betcha took a lot of women that got released from recruitment." What about this sequence of events was not a catty use of an innocent colony to get back at a GC member that you don't like? Seriously? You didn't post that with good intentions bc it was irrelevant to the situation at UGA. Quit pretending. We aren't dumb. We remember your prior ugly remarks about her chapter. There is a such thing as reading between the lines.

[amIblue?]

Originally Posted by Hartofsec

Actually Titchou brought up Alabama.

Please point out where her organization has been attacked. Stating that a recolonizing organization pledges girls who have been released from recruitment is not an attack.

Rather, it is some of you who are imposing a negative view on pledging these girls with your characterization of this as an "attack."

Titchou brought up Alabama as a means of telling the OP that she is familiar with large, competitive recruitments.

You just don't like her and feel the need to bring up her chapter.

[Hartofsec]

Originally Posted by AOII Angel

It has nothing to do with pledging women who may have been released from recruitment. It is about a pattern of bringing up DG specifically to slam Titchou. She never said that SECglitter or women who were released are not worthy of membership. You read that into her posts then threw her chapter's new colonization in her face and said, "betcha took a lot of women that got released from recruitment." What about this sequence of events was not a catty use of an innocent colony to get back at a GC member that you don't like? Seriously? You didn't post that with good intentions bc it was irrelevant to the situation at UGA. Quit pretending. We aren't dumb. We remember your prior ugly remarks about her chapter. There is a such thing as reading between the lines.

Would be much appreciated if you quoted what I actually said instead.

If there is a vulnerable party on this thread, it is a young lady who is disappointed following her release from recruitment.

Not an organization. Not an alum.

[carnation]

Okay, y'all. Ground rules: from now on, nobody mention any chapter in any disparaging way. Nobody make any digs, sly or open or whatever, at other posters either. I bet that SECglitter is hiding in terror somewhere.

[amIblue?]

Originally Posted by Hartofsec

If there is a vulnerable party on this thread, it is a young lady who is disappointed following her release from recruitment.

Not an organization. Not an alum.

Well, you're 100% right about that.

So why is it that you felt the need to bring up DG?

[HQWest]

^^^

and read your posts before hitting send so that your tone (?) comes across....

[HQWest]

[AZTheta]

Hartofsec: you can backpedal and try to put whatever spin you want on what you've posted. It's not working. The bottom line up front is that you've been called out on your isht by numerous GC posters of both genders and from multiple GLOs. You burned your butt, now you get to sit on the blister.

By the way, count me in that group, above. You need to stop. Your condescension is palpable.

to the OP: go get some popcorn and a soda and go sit up in the bleachers for a while. Perhaps the moderator(s) will edit out the offending posts in this thread (since they have a penchant for doing so), and you can come back, and we'll resume.

IBTL.

eta: HQ, xoxoxo to you for that great Panhell reminder.

[FSUZeta]

Originally Posted by carnation

Okay, y'all. Ground rules: from now on, nobody mention any chapter in any disparaging way. Nobody make any digs, sly or open or whatever, at other posters either. I bet that SECglitter is hiding in terror somewhere.

Please heed what carnation said and just let it lie or the thread will have to be closed.